The Armadillo's New Amerikan Orwellian Dictionary

Amerika's Orwellian dictionary is drawn from various sources.

It is important to understand what the source is, for in Orwellian Amerika words and phrases do not have objective meaning. Rather, the meaning changes depending upon the source. Therefore sources are noted before the term.

The contributors of new definitions are designated in parenthesis (Con., ............).

(Con., Oblamer*) Americans: lazy people.

* This coming from some one who has never had a productive job, always lived off government largess in various forms, and who goes golfing, takes a vacation or plans to be out of the country when ever difficult issues are addressed and hard work is required. He has out-Owelled Orwell!

(Con., Democrats)
The Rich: The reason people are poor.

(Con., Democrats)
The poor: The victims of the rich.

(Con., Democrats/Republicans)
The middle class: rich fields for the harvesting of taxation.

(Con., Radical Muslims)
Muslim: a seeker of peace, an advocate of the religion of peace....Yea, Right!

(Con.,. US college economics professors)
Intellectual; a Marxist

(Con., Intellectuals/Modern Liberals)

Relativist: an intellectual

(Con., Intellectuals/Modern Liberals)

Conservative: a recidivist (also see troglodyte)

(Con., Intellectuals/Modern Liberals)
Traditionalist; a cultural ludite--see narrow-minded. (Also see moralistic troglodyte, Nazi.)

(Con., Federal bureaucrat/SPLC/NAACP)

Racist: An individual (or institution) that fails to treat minorities (except white and orientals) as a privileged and protected class.

Politician: A slave of the monied elite and special interest that fund him. A thief and a liar that carries on the evil he does behind the veneer of governmental authority as he picks the pockets of the citizenry for the benefit of himself and the monied interests he serves, all done under the aegis of a false philanthropy commonly referred to as "the greater good." He, of course, judiciously avoids ever revealing whose "greater good" is it he's serving.


Political Slogan: A statement that encourages an enthusiasm, program or action without a defined goal, object or purpose: "Yes, we can!" ,"Forward," " A New Deal," "The Great Society," etc.

(Con., Federal bureaucrat)

Governmental equality: Having a special set of standards, rewards, and compensations for certain minorities from whom votes might be had.

(Con., Intellectuals/Modern Liberals)

Moral absolutist: Nazi


Libertarian: An anarchist whose individualist philosophy cloaks the reality he is a Nazi, a racist and a white supremacist. Some racists to keep an eye on: Justice Clarence Thomas, Dr. Walter Williams, Dr. Thomas Sowell. 

Politically Incorrect: The courageous and open stating of truths various totalitarian minority groups on the illiberal Left find offensive because they are contradictory to their "smelly little orthodoxies," and because they expose them for what and who they are: a pack of savage, tyrannical swine who fly into a mad rage the moment any pearls of truth are cast in their direction.

(Con., Intellectuals/Modern Liberals)

Truth teller: See "Orwellian"

(Con., Intellectuals/Modern Liberals)

Orwellian: A visionary who sees the endless, creative and pragmatic usefulness in the malleability of language and meaning for personal advantage and gain. (See politician).

(Con., Intellectuals/Modern Liberals)

Politician: Orwellian

(Con., Intellectuals/Modern Liberals)

President: the Grand Orwellian Wizard (See "silver fox")

(Con., Marxists/Democrats)

The über rich: Those who have a disorder commonly known as "Scrooge McDuck Syndrome," and have succeeded in making large sums of money for the sole purpose and intent of making others as poor as possible.

(Con., Neocons)

Neocon: an advocate of peace and liberty whose primary means are sanctions, threats, saber rattling, intriguing and overwhelming military force.

(Con., Neocons)

Defensive foreign policy: A policy advocated by cowards, traitors and commies. (see Ron Paulism).

(Con., Neocons)

Pre-emptive war: War to prevent war.

(Con., Neocons)

Patriot act: A legislative act advocating the domestic application of the principle of pre-emptive war, giving the government the right to side-step the Constitution and the protections of the individual in Bill of Rights, and threaten, intimidate and place citizens in indefinite detention at the pleasure of the ruling elite. 

(Con., the few sane people who remain in the amerikan orwellian state)

Classical Liberal: an individual who believes in a society based upon limited government, and individual liberty lived in a context of natural law.

(Con., the few sane people who remain in the amerikan orwellian state)
Modern Liberal: an individual who believes in unlimited government as an instrument for enforcing autocratic rule upon the collective, rooted in positive law as determined by mob rule (aka, democracy).

(Con., the few sane people who remain in the amerikan orwellian state)

Federal judicial review: The process by which the black robed foxes are asked to decide if what the red foxes and the silver fox have decided to do to the hens is constitutional.

(Con., the few sane people who remain in the amerikan orwellian state)

Hens: The prey of foxes regardless of colour. (see Federal judicial review)

(Con., Neocons)

War: 1) The primary duty and purpose of the state, especially wars of conquest, control and confiscation. 2) The antidote to peace.

(Con., Federal government--aka, Linconia)

Affirmative action: 1) Governmental racism, the purported purpose of which is to counteract individual racism. 2) Institutional racism based upon low expectations of minority academic performance--placing minorities who actually do excel under the perpetual cloud of suspicion regarding tokenism and incompetence.

(Con., the few sane people who remain in the amerikan orwellian state)

Lobbyist: The John.

(Con., the few sane people who remain in the amerikan orwellian state)

Legislator: The Ho; the bought and paid for slave of special interest Johns.

(Con., the few sane people who remain in the amerikan orwellian state)

Statists: The pimps. (also see bankers, military industrialists, the monied class)

(Con., the few sane people who remain in the amerikan orwellian state)

We the People: That group which, through the system set up by the Lobbyists, the Legislators and the Statists, always ends up getting screwed.

(Con., the few sane people who remain in the amerikan orwellian state)

Peace: The absence of conflict resulting in social tranquility, cooperation between classes and races and economic prosperity, all of which are conditions generally understood to be intolerable to the state and dangerous to the ruling class.

(Obama administration)

Shared Sacrifice (aka, "fair share"): Federal CONFISCATION and TYRANNY in the form of increased PLUNDER and PILLAGING of ALL Americans for the benefit of vote buying, influence peddling, special interest serving, collectivist politicians and government elites, all carried out under the aegis of the false philanthropy of "the greater good."

Isolationism---really???

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_THE_RON_PAUL_FACTOR?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-11-18-18-27-33

Ron Paul speaking in Anamosa, Iowa talks about reducing foreign aid and military spending to bring a one trillion dollar cut in the Federal budget his first year in office.

Defending his foreign policy Paul stated,"Yes, we have to have national security, but we don't get it by bankrupting our country and being in everyone's face constantly," Paul said.

The lame stream press, siding with the neocon killers in government, routinely call Dr. Paul's foreign policy "isolationist."
Really?
Paul's foreign policy is the policy of the Founders.

Why not call the neocon's policy for what it is: imperialist, aggressive, obnoxious, coercive, hegemonic?

Hey, what do you know! The Federal government treats foreigners just like they treat us!

As usual Dr. Paul remains the voice of reason amid an ocean of mad, imperialist rhetoric--rhetoric out of touch with the reality that we're broke as a nation! Hellooooo!

Why do congressmen ignore this reality and continue committing generational theft upon our children and children's children?
Paul makes an attempt at giving at least part of the answer:
"Congress and military contractors are too closely tied together."

Bingo. The wars are not to protect us; they are not to "defend the good." They are to enrich the few in the oligarchy at the expense of We the People through the confiscation and plunder of the fruit of our labor, either through direct taxation or indirect taxation: ie. generation theft and/or inflation.

This evil symbiosis, which Eisenhower warned us about, is nothing but neocon-style wealth redistribution in order to build political patronage and buy votes--not from the bottom feeding hoi polloi composed of We the People, but from top feeding industrialists; the killer scum floating on top of the ocean of humanity, those who make instruments of destruction and profit from aggression and death.

Of course, this is all sold to We the Tax Payers in the benign form of "patriotism."

The jingoist, Orwellian state is alive and well amongst us, and it infects both parties.

Only Dr. Paul, in the interest of We the People and his love of liberty, is courageous enough to stand up and proclaim opposition to these lies and deceptions.
He gives us a true glimpse into what authentic patriotism is while, ipso facto, exposing the phonies.

NO MORE WAR!!!

Neocon fear mongering intimidates all the Lilliputians running for president into slavish obedience to the UNConstitutional Bush doctrine of preemptive war--- behold the new American Orwellian construct for We the Brain dead: War to Prevent War!
One courageous man alone stands firm for the constitution and the liberty of a peaceful republic. How much death and destruction will be enough for those who will use "peace" as the excuse for more and more war?

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57323686-503544/romney-gingrich-at-gop-debate-wed-go-to-war-to-keep-iran-from-getting-nuclear-weapons/

HOLIDAY DISH---

Double click on the image below for a recipe

you will say is the best pie you've ever had!

Make it for your holiday get togethers---people will flip!

Sean Hannity's incoherent Neocon Madness

"Son, all I've ever asked of my Marines is that they obey my orders as if they would the Word of God. We are here to help the Vietnamese because inside every Gook there is an American trying to get out. It's a hard ball world son. We've got to try to keep our heads until this peace craze blows over." from Stanley Kubrik's Full Metal Jacket

If these words were set to music it would be the Neocon national anthem.

You've got to hand it to Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Bill Krystol and their Neocon buddies on talk radio and FOX. They are very critical of the execrable fiscal and domestic policies of America's incompetent leadership. Their criticisms have often gone across party lines. Not infrequently it is intense.
The impression any listener comes away with is that we have highly flawed leadership that pays little or no heed to the Constitution, thumbs its nose at the Bill of Rights and is destroying our economy and our liberty.

But when Hannity and his ilk begin to assess the decisions and choices of these same leaders, past and present, in regard to foreign policy a miraculous transformation occurs in these deeply flaw, inept souls. Suddenly, these leaders become brilliant---even infallible.

There is no war, it seems, that Hannity and his Neocon cronies will disapprove of except for reasons of political partisanship.

There is no place on the earth Krauthammer cannot find American interest that must be defended with military might. There is no place that Neocons do not see the possibility of aggression that must be stopped before it begins. Action must be taken preemptively before it's too late!

Men like Mark Levin are incapable of seeing that the lust of military power and aggression abroad destroys the possibility of his domestic vision of a humble central government and true constitutional federalism.

This military aggression, this insistence on growing American military might even poisoned Ronald Reagan's hope to reduce the size of government and re-embrace constitutionalism.

And God help the soul that dares to indicate there might be some flaw in America foreign policy that might possibly have caused the blowback resulting in the first attack on the World Trade Center, the Cole and 9/11.

To paraphrase Christ the Lord, "Blessed are the peace makers, for they shall have their eyes scratched out." This is most certainly true if one speaks in ear-shot of a Neocon.

The most recent Neocon "holier than thou" attack is the one now being unleashed on Tony Bennett for remarking that American foreign policy might have had something (not everything, just something) to do with the attack of 9/11.

Upon hearing such "treasonous blasphemy" from Mr. Bennett the indignant and "patriotic" self-righteousness of the Neocons would, as we say back home, gag a maggot.

When I consider the commentaries and opinions of the Neocons I find an inner contradiction there I am hard pressed to resolve. It is simply this: how is it leaders who are horrible and incompetent with domestic policy transform into infallible visionaries when it comes to foreign policy, and that those policies are above all criticism, whether that criticism comes from America's perceived enemies or our own citizens? And speaking of citizens, how is it Americans who level such criticism are instantly shouted down by Neocon chicken hawks who never served or fought? How is it those who protest are labeled unpatriotic and their comments condemned as treasonous? How is it our leaders' choices of foreign policy, wars, aggression and interventionism are all beyond questioning or fault? How is it that any action taken by foreign entities in response to American aggression and interventionism is labeled totally unjust and unprovoked? How is it Neocons are as tone deaf on foreign policy as the liberal left is on domestic policy? How is it the Neocons can claim that such actions are carried out by evil men who do what they do just because they hate us...and they hate us without a reason?

Such are a few of the incoherent, contradictory and arbitrary positions of the Neocons. Apparently, every act of aggression, control and intervention in their view serves to elevate American glory and is completely justified. They do not give equal respect to the sovereignty of other nations and peoples. They may not say it, but their actions show they think these other lands and people are inferior and do not have the same rights as we Americans. They think, with the colonel in Full Metal Jacket, that where ever they go, there's a gook with an American inside trying to get out...and that the world belongs to America. They, of course, would not openly say as much, but their actions betray their true feelings.

In the Neocon philosophy, dear friends, we see the very acme of American jingoism--the nationalism that has usurped and now charades as the pathetic and poor chimera of the patriotism of our original Republic. And it, every bit as much as the welfarism of the liberals, is destroying what little remains of the shattered fragments of our once free and glorious Republic.

Poor Tony, defenseless and alone, he has issued an apology that has served to assuage the outrage of the Neocons––not at all. They remain indignant and disconsolate; as childishly offended and unforgiving as the liberals.

Only one man inside the Beltway I know of has been consistent--and long before these Machiavellian talking heads posing as Conservatives got into the game. That man is Dr. Ron Paul.

Long ago Dr. Paul saw what the Neocons are apparently incapable of seeing: that an aggressive, hegemonic, imperialistic foreign policy is incompatible with and destroys the possibility of Constitutionally limited government. He saw an aggressive government abroad would, ipso facto, be a despotic one at home, that the lust and mania for power and control could not be limited by borders. Long ago Dr. Paul rigorously and rightly taught this along with a program of true fiscal sanity and restraint. And he did it when no one was listening. He was often ignored and even ostracized--yet, he continued undaunted and undeterred.

Countless times in the Congress he stood alone–––alone, just him and the Constitution.

If we had listened to Dr. Paul then and followed his ideas in the 1980 and 90s America would freer today and not teetering on the precipice of fiscal and social disaster.

As Jon Stewart put it, "All that small government grassroots business? He (Ron Paul) planted that grass. The other folks? They're just moral majorities in a tri-cornered hat. Ron Paul is the real deal. These others just recently showed up and started mowing the grass."

The Welfare/Warfare state has it easy. They are to government what Coke and Pepsi are to soft drinks. All they have to say is, "Coke is it!"---"The Pepsi Generation!"--and they sell their wares. How different is that from the jingoism of the Neocons? How different is "Coke is it" from the parroting of "You're a great American!" ? I'll tell you; it is no different at all! It is just as mindless, just as empty, just as vacuous, and just as destructive. These radio catch phrases destroy the true health and honor of a nation like these soft drinks destroy the health of the body.

In response I ask, "Where's the beef?" Where are the Constitution, limited government, American Liberty and peace and prosperity to be found in all this welfare/warfare-ism?

The fact is there is no beef, and following these twin pied pipers, with their false patriotism and false, misguided compassion, is leading America to ruin and her people to incalculable suffering.

Among those vying for the highest office in the land in 2012 only Ron Paul has consistently shown character, coherence, courage and dedication to the Constitution.

There is an antidote for the falseness of Obama's hope and change and Neocon aggression posing as conservatism. It is Ron Paul.

Dr. Paul has the cure for the twin poisons of the welfare and warfare state. May God, in His infinite Mercy, help enough Americans to see it before it is too late.

Remembering 9/11

Today we commemorate a terrible day in the lives of all Americans--a day thousands suffered and died and countless lives were changed. I note the news has been filled with programming that reveals more and more details of WHAT happened on that terrible day. The media is reflecting on and recounting those events in microscopic detail. It is touching. But in this great orgy of remembrance something screams at me by its absence. We know more and more about what happened, but programming is virtually silent on why it happened.

Who or what is to blame? Obviously, those who flew the planes make up the proximate cause and must bear much of the blame. But were these just evil men conspiring to do evil for evil's sake---psychotic mad-dogs attacking for attacking's sake--void of provocation? Was it just purposeless and senseless evil and violence they had in mind and nothing more? Some say yes. Others in the past, especially immediately after the initial attack, said otherwise. They said it was our fault; We the People--our lives and our freedoms drove them to seek to destroy us. Thus began the blame game, and few in Washington, either then or now, doubted that explanation. To repeat; We as a nation and a people did nothing to provoke these fanatics, BUT, if any one in America must bear any guilt of provocation it could only be We the People, our lives and our freedoms. Thus said the talking heads and government officials in lock step.

Let this sink into your ears. Here's the headline as it should have been written in the Washington Post on 9/12:

US GOVERNMENT BLAMES "WE THE PEOPLE" FOR MUSLIM ATTACKS.

We the people suffered and died on 9/11 because Muslim fanatics hated our life-styles and freedoms. But our brave government is doing all it can to protect us from the consequences of our folly.

Get the message: OUR GOVERNMENT blames us! We endure Muslim terrorist threats today because of how we live--there is no other reason. Muslims are simply jealous of our freedoms and they want to kill us.

Is this what the perpetrators of Islamic terrorism say?....Not exactly.

When asked, Muslim fanatics never mention the freedom or lives of Americans as the reason they attack us.

Let this sink into your ears: unlike our government and television talking heads, the terrorists don't blame us. They blame those who have blamed us: OUR GOVERNMENT and its aggressive, interventionist foreign policies in Muslim lands.

Who will we listen to? Our government which seeks to exculpate itself by pointing the finger at We the People? Or the attackers, who are in virtual unanimity about why they attacked and continue to attack America: Federal interventionist foreign policy in Muslim lands.

Don't misunderstand. I'm not saying the Muslim fanatics are completely blameless. What I am saying is the Federal government is, in some degree, clearly blameworthy. What I am saying is that it takes two to tango, and when you meddle, intervene, control and dictate policy to others, it is unreasonable to think they will continually take it and not try to strike back in some way.

In the past two months American planes have bombed targets in Libya, killing thousands there. Here is a place the CIA told Obama we have no strategic or economic interests--and yet we intervene and bomb in yet another shadow war--undeclared by congress. To the politicians and the media it is a "non-war." To the dead it must seem very real indeed.

Contrary to the Neocon's despot's-eye view of history, the collapse of the Soviet Union was not the sign that made us Kings of the World; it did not give us the right to use our military as a world police when ever and where ever the delusional Neocons see "American interests"---whatever that is.

Our non-interventionism in Syria and Somalia has had no effect on us as a nation or a people. In contrast, our government's needless intervention in Libya will see blow-back in the near future, and Libyans will be found among those Muslim fanatics who seek to attack us--NOT because of our freedoms, but because of the decision of the Federal government to bomb their lands and intervene in their domestic affairs.

Contrary to the Federal Government which points the finger at We the People as the reason for domestic Muslim terrorism, We the People are not the cause. But we are the solution.

We must stop electing those who make and maintain aggressive, interventionist foreign policy. We must elect those who support the Monroe Doctrine of domestic defense and reject the Bush interventionist policy of aggression and pre-emption; we must choose those who seek a peaceful foreign policy, who are willing to negotiate and end sanctions that harm the citizens of Muslim lands, starving their children (while having virtually no effect on the rulers). We must seek to elect those who are desirous of establishing peaceful trade with all who are willing to do so. THAT, not aggressive interventionism driven by the Military/Industrial complex and promoted by "manifest destiny" Neocon talking head progressives, THAT is the path to the restoration of American peace and prosperity.

Remember, peace and prosperity come together or not at all. And those who desire prosperity must seek and PRACTICE a policy of peace.

follow up letter to Jeff Bolton, KLIF talk show host

Mr. Bolton,

This will make the third time I've written you--the first two letters garnering no response.

My main subject in those previous posts was your unfairness to Dr. Paul and his foreign policy. I posted the second letter on my blog; avengingarmadillo.blogspot.com

This is a brief follow up to say just a few things.

I believe now...

1....your patriotism is misplaced, for it supports Federal foreign policies that only grow government, bringing American to penury at home and make us increasingly hated abroad.

2. ...you have been fooled into thinking a Wilsonian/T. Roosevelt-like progressive foreign policy, a la the Neocons, is both conservative and patriotic. You are tragically wrong on both issues. True conservatism is non-interventionist--non-nation building--non-aggressive and does not act preemptively.

Your failure to acknowledge this as a possibility, your refusal to see it as an historical fact, and your refusal to consider that Dr. Paul's foreign policy might bring peace and prosperity to America is either blindness or intransigence driven by the stubbornness of human pride.

Your refusal to consider that continuing to waste our wealth and the lives of our youngest and best in wars that are driven by profiteers and hegemonic propagandists makes you complicit in the criminal acts and policies of our government that are destroying our economy, our nation and the future for our children.

I will be posting this on my blog as I did my previous post to you. Thank you for showing who you really are by completely disregarding the thoughtful communiques of your listeners. I thought you were a courageous man by how you comported yourself when Beck attacked Medina. But I am now sad to see you've swallowed the Neocon propaganda now, hook, line and sinker--and both your intellect and your courage have failed you.

sincerely,

Tom Ridenour, Duncanviile